Review Roundup - You know the name...

SKYFALL (2012)

To no ones surprise, James Bond has returned. I enjoyed nearly everything they did with Casino Royale which still holds up as a really edge of your seat action adventure, with just enough hints of characterisation to keep me involved, great set pieces and a nice score. What keeps me watching however is the pacing of events and staging of the action on top of that. The badly thought out sequel took things in totally the wrong direction with shaky cam gibberish and zero personality, so I was set for a return to form or at least a vast improvement - after all, the reactionary nature of this series is well documented. So yes Skyfall does a lot right and moves away from that in spades, but while there's a lot of this I like... it felt as though the structure was all over the place.

Here they seem to want all the serious drama, all the heavy moral issues, and then at the same time mix that up with the older school stuff like a Goldfinger DB5 out of nowhere... they're going to throw in these pop references now after ignoring them for so long? Is this still a reboot before or are we pretending it's a continuation now? Were the last couple of Craig outings a starting point for the other 20 plus adventures and this is now a successor? If they wanted to get back to the roots why is the gun barrel at the end, like it's an embarrassing relic? This conflicted approach spoils things a bit, and I wish they'd just pick a side. There are great dramatic moments mixed with strange almost inappropriate quips, it's a little odd. That being said it still manages to celebrate 50 years with more finesse that what they did at 40 though, so let's not think about that one... the idea of CGI wave surfing alone makes me want to gag.

I mentioned the music in Casino Royale, and so one thing I have to mention here - I missed having a David Arnold soundtrack during the film's duration. After serving so well all this time, what's up with the music in this? I appreciate the director Sam Mendes wanted it to be scored by his old time collaborator, but it feels like those older ones where you realise John Barry wasn't available and a disco Bond theme starts playing. Some of it doesn't even fit what is happening on screen, and to make things worse they borrow cues from Casino Royale and throw them in at odd places. Like the tone, the mix of orchestra and electronica doesn't gel. I have to admit the Adele theme itself works better than I originally thought at least after hearing it initially, and the film sound mix gives it a boost that tinny radio broadcasts lack. The intro is pretty slick alongside it, but I guess stylish CG credits sequences are a given at this point. It gets points for the striking imagery though, more death and less kitsch is nice to see.

I guess the big positive is that I really liked Javier Bardem - it's hardly a revelation but good characters are something that are a total must here, and he was intense when required along with being suitably charismatic and campy at regular intervals. Besides, it's nice to see a memorable villain, and he does get the best scenes. What was shown of the Quantum rogue's gallery was so totally forgettable, who cared about that guy's water stealing plan? Nobody. In fact the same can be said of the whole thing, so let's gloss over that episode and move on. Here we have a thriller that manages to sit at that mid level of the series for me - despite being so well made it doesn't sit properly as a consistent thriller and never reaches the heights of the better entries to franchise that I'd say are my favourites. Despite the applauded cinematography looking very nice and the refreshing plot being at it's heart a simple vendetta for once, it's not a personal high point. Maybe it's all that unrealistic techno babble or the lack of impact events seem to have taken during the closing scenes but I just didn't get all the hype despite having a good time.


Review Roundup - It's about time...

LOOPER (2012)

Original write up February '13

Rian's Johnson's ultra stylish time travel thriller almost lives up to the buzz, thanks to great performances all round (even from the dreaded child actor) and some cool near-but-not-quite future ideas that nicely realise the world without going overboard on effects. It's a recognisable cityscape, despite the eye dropper drugs and hover bikes. I liked how people have began to develop telekinetic powers from small mutations or evolutionary changes, and it just ends up disappointing everyone... these are small things that make it such a neat set-up.

But like I said adding such a good human element to all this is what makes the movie, and the two leads are really strong even if the effects to make it seem like they are the same person at different ages are quite distracting at times. It was a good idea, but little things you can't disguise with make-up like the proportions between someone's nose and lips throw it off the whole time.

So hitmen are hired in the near future to take out victims sent back in time from 30 years ahead of this, intrigue or unnecessary? I like the idea, and the narrative does a fair job of the reasoning for this. The idea about closing "loops" and killing your own aged self, less so. The film as a whole is a fun thrill ride, particularly the opening half which is incredibly slick and includes a great mixture of visual and musical elements - the standout scene is the main character's transition through the present into the future in a montage. Of course since he works for an organised crime group things soon go wrong for him and other characters, and this allows for some good chases and violent moments.

It's not perfect though, and the middle section drags a little once new plot developments come into play, without going into spoilers here. Despite a fresh feeling to the film, there are a few silly movie clichés dropped here and there (people randomly sleeping together because of expected gender interaction is one of my most eye-rolling tropes) and if you're thinking of it all as a Doc Brown diagram based version of time travel with timelines and diagrams, forget it now. If there was ever a crystalline idea for their version of cause and effect or fate versus change, it's been muddied or under explained. Still the overall film is a solid one and I am a big fan of these kinds of low budget sci-fi thrillers. The emotive drama being punctuated with some nice action sequences helps.


Review Roundup - Kaneda??


Danny Boyle venturing back into to creepy stuff is always nice, but this homage to the designs of 2001, Alien and even Event Horizon is pretty good even if that third act is a little out of nowhere initially. It gets less jarring with repeat views, though it's shame the scope of a cinema screen is lost now on home formats. The idea they can restart our Sun with nuclear bomb of some kind remains a little silly to me (where did they find enough material to make it?) but it's still an entertaining look at things going wrong in space, a nice genre for me.

The psychological aspects of the mission are touched on perhaps a little too lightly, but there are plenty of mission screw up tropes that get played out. It's an atmospheric thriller rather than one that goes into depth about the crew getting irritated with other as the mistakes pile up and the space madness grows. They do get a bit stir crazy before the critical mission errors, but I guess they'd be prepared for this kind of thing despite the on board shrink being flaky and the engineer having anger problems. Hardly the right stuff. The design work is pretty nice and the big vista shots are one of the high points, with the shield-ship and the space suits making for some really good images. The third act comes up with a few story turning points that could have been dealt with better but I figure that people fighting against someone that wants them to fail and deal with their natural fate is interesting enough. This is mostly a good time regardless of those weaker elements.


Short Film Safari - Yellow

With the impending trailer release for Elysium incoming pretty soon, I went back and took a look into a few of the director's older short films, which are still well worth seeing. This is probably the one I like best, and think would make a great feature if they ever expanded on the premise.

Short film Safari - Keloid

Admittedly there's not a lot here as it's mostly a trailer rather than a normal short, but it's still pretty impressive whatever it is exactly that's going on - there are no live action elements being used.

Short Film Safari - The Gift

A short thriller set in futuristic Russia, The Gift has some impressive robotic effects and a neat premise that allows for a nice chase story to unfold while at the same time building a very atmospheric mood.

Short Film Safari - Metalosis Maligna

Don't worry, this isn't a real medical video. The tone is still slightly harrowing though, as it describes a fictitious condition you might find familiar if you ever read the manga series Akira or saw body horror movie Tetsuo: The Iron Man. The special effects are equally impressive as they are disturbing in some places.

Scores Explained


While 10 star ratings offer some nuance, they often confuse me. How much worse than 9 is 8? Is everything below 6 worthless? How far from 5 stops being average? There's just too much going on and I don't like it. Admittedly there are many levels that need to be expressed at times, usually levels of bad. I have of course got into them writing elsewhere. But here I use a simple five points rating, from great ... to irate. These are basically satisfaction ratings so don't expect one 3 star movie to be comparable to another in a straight up way since things that work in one instance may not in another. There are many factors, these are simply how satisfied I felt at the end within any given genre and considering the overall pros and cons.

5/5 ☆☆☆☆
Flawless victory? Well nothing's perfect, it's a big personal preference. This is a rare score given to those movies which give me a certain vibe, a particular feeling. Something that really strikes a nerve. Often they are thingsI have seen many times before that have grown to this status with time, but every so often one will come along. A rare score from me. Platinum medal.

4/5 ☆☆☆☆
A good movie, a standard recommendation. Some flaws are present but they can be overlooked as it's still a satisfying experience. Very entertaining, or engaging. No anticlimaxes or weak acts during the narrative unless they're very minor. Whether or not I would consider watching it multiple times is another question but there are qualities here to be considered. Gold medal.

3/5 ☆☆
Disappointing in some ways but still okay. A story that falls down due to notable flaws but isn't a train wreck. Has enough good points to talk about but is never brilliant except perhaps in short bursts. May be watchable or even something I like to revisit frequently but never excellent outside a few moments even if they stand out. Perhaps one element spoils the fun or it's just not exceptional overall. Silver medal.

2/5 ☆☆
Big flaws detract from the film. There may be things I like but there are not enough to win me over. Often a big failure to capitalise on certain elements or an what might have been a good idea but is poorly executed. Perhaps the pieces are all here but they've been scattered rendering them almost useless. Not rock bottom but doesn't go anywhere towards average either. A failure to be interesting consistently or something that just becomes boring outside a few scenes. Bronze medal.

Useless. The good points are barely visible or totally overshadowed; it's just sunk by too many holes. Incredibly disappointing or tedious. Sometimes simple movie making incompetence is shown, and it may be very dull or very irritating. Maybe both. Tin medal.